by Amram Altzman for newvoices.com
I've
written before on my day school education and its different aspects,
critiquing how it taught me (or perhaps should have taught me) to look
at my history and my past; I’ve also offered what can perhaps be best
described as a back-handed compliment to my Jewish education. Now, as
someone who has been out of the pre-college Jewish educational world for
almost a year, I have begun to think about the lasting impact that my
twelve years of elementary and secondary Jewish education has had on me.
One
the one hand, my back-handed compliment still stands: in high school
especially, I was incredibly cynical, especially when it came to
studying rabbinic legal texts. To a certain extent, I still am, even if
I’ve elected to continue studying those very same texts as part of my
higher education at the Jewish Theological Seminary. In high school,
however, I found it difficult to relate to the texts that I was reading —
partially because the intricacies of how to build a sukkah and whether
or not it can be built in the public domain, or who is guilty of murder
in the case when a baby is thrown off a roof and lands on a person
carrying a sword and dies, were not relevant to my life. Interesting to
ponder and debate though these legal issues may have been, they had
little effect on my day-to-day interactions and realities as a Jew.
Instead,
one of the most formative years for my Jewish education, and,
especially my seven years of elementary and secondary Talmud education,
was in eleventh grade, when I had a teacher who took the tractate we
were studying, connected it to Enlightenment thinkers and biblical and
contemporary texts, and forced us to synthesize those texts in a way we
had not been asked to do before. For the first time, I felt that the
Jewish texts weren’t talking down to me, but talking to me. This was the
first time studying Jewish texts meant something to me. The rabbis of
the sixth century CE were not only in conversation amongst themselves,
but with me and with Søren Kierkegaard and Immanuel Kant and with
rabbinic commentators. It was then that I truly felt that the texts I
was studying were Not In Heaven — not in the sense that they were
immutable and everlasting, but in the sense that they mattered to me and
had implications for me today.
Continue reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment